Git Common-Flow 1.0.0-draft.1 ============================= Summary ------- Common-Flow is an attempt to gather a sensible selection of the most common usage patterns of git out in the wild into a single and concise specification. It is based on the [original variant](http://scottchacon.com/2011/08/31/github-flow.html) of [GitHub Flow](https://guides.github.com/introduction/flow/), while taking into account how a lot of open source projects use git. Terminology: - Master Branch - Should always be deployable/usable, is considered bleeding edge, and must be named `master`. - Change Branches - Any branch that introduces changes (new feature, bug fix, etc), should be created off of the master branch, and must have a descriptive name. - Maintenance Branches - Used to maintain old versions, and should follow a `stable-X.Y` naming pattern, where `X` is MAJOR version and `Y` is MINOR version. - Pull Request - A means of requesting that a change branch is merged in to the master branch, allowing others to review, discuss and approve the changes. - Release - Consists of a version bump commit directly on the master branch, and a git tag named according to the new version number placed on said commit. Requirements overview: - The "master" branch should always be deployable/usable, while also considered to be bleeding edge. - New work must be done on a descriptively named change branch created off of the master branch. - Commit to the change branch locally, and regularly push your work to the same named branch on the remote server. - When you need feedback, help, or think the branch is ready for merging, open a pull request. - After someone else has reviewed and signed off on the change, you can merge it in to the master branch. - New releases are created by committing a version bump commit directly to the master branch, and then tagging that commit with the version. - Maintenance branches are updated by manually merging and/or back-porting relevant change branches in to them. Git Common-Flow Specification (Common-Flow) ------------------------------------------- The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119). 1. A branch called "master" MUST exist, and it SHOULD be referred to as the "master branch". The master branch MUST always be in a non-broken state, but MUST be considered to be "bleeding edge". That means the master branch MUST always be in a good enough state that, depending on your deployment/release flow, a new release can always be built from master, or that master can always be safely deployed to production. 2. Changes MUST be performed on a separate branch that SHOULD be referred to as a "change branch". All change branches MUST have descriptive names. You SHOULD commit often locally, and you MUST regularly push your work to the same named branch on the remote server.