diff --git a/source/blog/_posts/2010-02-05-automated-profile-picture-update-server.md b/source/blog/_posts/2010-02-05-automated-profile-picture-update-server.md
index cacb07f..dc7d499 100644
--- a/source/blog/_posts/2010-02-05-automated-profile-picture-update-server.md
+++ b/source/blog/_posts/2010-02-05-automated-profile-picture-update-server.md
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ He also didn't like the new profile picture, but that's his problem. My first re
A service which automagically just updates your Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, YouTube, Vimeo, Gravatar, *...* profile pictures would be quite cool. Thinking about it a bit more, there are three problems with building such a service:
-* A lot of these sites you will need to crawl programmatically using some kind of web-crawler library. It will be a paid to write, and even bigger pain whenever they change anything in the HTML layout of their pages.
+* A lot of these sites you will need to crawl programmatically using some kind of web-crawler library. It will be a pain to write, and even bigger pain whenever they change anything in the HTML layout of their pages.
* Some sites have specific and/or strange restrictions for image dimensions, file size, and even file format.
* Will people actually trust such a service with passwords for all of their online social networking accounts?
diff --git a/source/blog/_posts/2010-02-05-new-avatar-same-old-fugly-face.md b/source/blog/_posts/2010-02-05-new-avatar-same-old-fugly-face.md
index b199645..896cd76 100644
--- a/source/blog/_posts/2010-02-05-new-avatar-same-old-fugly-face.md
+++ b/source/blog/_posts/2010-02-05-new-avatar-same-old-fugly-face.md
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ So without further ado, I present my old and my new avatar in complete Fancybox
-And because I'm a perfectionist and decent bit insane, here's the 50x50 pixels version too, so you can see how they both look in really small sizes, which is the most common size they appear in on different sites anyway.
+Because I'm a perfectionist and decent bit insane, here's the 50x50 pixel versions too, so you can see how they both look in really small sizes, which is the most common size they appear in on different sites anyway.
